Adrian Janzen: Waukomis' Penicillin-Resistant Slut Homophobe
Town tramp Adrian Janzen can’t stand the thought of gays being married. Why it’s against the Bible she claims! She told me so during a Facebook conversation and said, “I don't acknowledge faggit...gerble swappers!! I'm sorry you're dad raped you up the ass when you were little...but deal with your hang ups some other way rather than packing fudge!! U understand queer? That's what I thought!! While
Wow, she trashed me, Harry, and Corky all at the same time. I bet Corky can write better than she does though.
She’s never heard about me has she?
When you’ve been to the Garfield County Health Department and been told there’s nothing modern medicine can do for you, it’s probably a good idea not to stomp your slutty ass around the internet being holier than thou – especially when your Biblical declarations about the sanctity of marriage crashes into your white trash lifestyle of multiple marriages, going from one battering husband to another, and using your own child as a pawn. And it’s probably not a good idea to attack another’s morals, when right beside your self-righteous remarks is a photo of you in your panties and jutting your tits out.
This Adrian Janzen of
Those Walmartpanties go hand in hand with that bleached hair and the way the mouth looks makes me suspect there’s some missing teeth.
As things progressed, Adrian's husband Mark Janzen, a convicted wife beater who doesn’t like to support his child from another marriage, decided to send me this, “I'd live under a rock too if I was gay because I'd be ASHAMED OF MYSELF! You've picked a lifestyle that will be HELL ON YOU but I'm glad that at least you won't ever be able to have children so you could WARP THEIR INNOCENT MINDS WITH YOUR SICKNESS!!!!!”
Mark has had two wives. He beat both of them.
What you have here are two miserable people, who have failed in their own personal relationships and aren’t emotionally stable enough to deal with it. So they target gay marriage.
Facebook has cancelled
Your Typical Okie Homophobe –White Trash Slut Adrian Janzen
MarkDouglas Janzen
06/23/1970
Previous marriage to Tammy Deanne
Unpaid child support
Adrian Lanae Springer Janzen
Previous marriage to Fred Land
Mark and Adrian Married 10/25/07
Address:
Mark has recent charges in Garfield Co CM-2009-701
(Domestic abuse in front of child)
Mark is in a “BATTERER'S TREATMENT PROGRAM”
2002 conviction for transporting open container Garfield Co CM-2007-909
2002 protective order issued on her PO-2002-213
Foreclosure on their home 9/03/09
Garfield Co CJ-2009-362
Hunter, you're a gem. Keep up the great work you do -- especially when it comes to eviscerating white trash homophobes such as this semi-literate Waukomis harridan. (I love it!)
Reply to this
LMAO...Hunter, you're like a dog with a bone - I love it!
Reply to this
Hunter, I'm not one to back down from an insult either, though I don't have your investigative skills which sure can seem to find the dirt on just about anyone.
These pathetic hillbillies are just an appetizer.
Keep going after the people with money and political power who can _really_ hurt us GLBTs living in Oklahoma.
Reply to this
Hunter, little needs to be said beyond "you rock! my friend". But being an old queen known for verbosity when silence was the better idea......here goes.
It puts a strange twist on the gay marriage issue to think than any self-respecting queer would want to model a relationship on such a "legally sanctioned" coupling as this example of slut and batterer, assuming they're even married. [But as my Granny would say if she were still alive: "Thank the Lord they found each other so they're only messing up one house instead of two."]
Politically I've been supportive of my community's consensus that we should fight for marriage equality---but in my gut I've always agreed with those wizened elders who for 20 years or so have told us to redefine "marriage" on our own terms, that we shouldn't be trying to build on a model that's obviously broken. Str8s have a 50+% divorce rate [that even Silly Sally KKKern is trying to squelch with yet another new (and ultimately stupid) law that limits divorce]. (That woman does love to invade other people's bedrooms, whatever the pretext!) Their holier-than-thou, sanctified model of marriage is not making them (heteros) more loving, more monogamous, or more anything-else-that's-positive in a relationship. Why, oh why?, would we self-respecting queers want to copy anything even remotely resembling such catastrophic str8 failures for our own lives?
Okay, the tax incentives for "marriage" I understand. The Breeders have codified into law over 1,000 tax breaks and legal loopholes that are presently theirs exclusively. Yes, our relationships are equally legitimate enough to deserve a piece or two of that pie. I'm 110% in favor of equal inheritance and hospital visitation rights. And if your relationship is long-term and stable enough for you to be seriously considering children, then I agree that adoption or fostering or insemination (I plead a degree of ignorance here) SHOULD be legally available to you.
But those are LEGAL ISSUES and marriage is a religious-based church thing. Congress and our state legislatures should NOT be in our bedrooms or involved in the marriage business. (What other than "business" can you call it when there's so much profit to be made from sanctifying and dissolving "marriage"? Profits? Talk to any preacher, florist, caterer or divorce lawyer.) Do we really want to sacrifice our equally legitimate relationships on the altar of greed for nothing more than a higher level of mainstream "tolerance"? PUL-LEAZ!! I have yet to have a relationship I disrespected enough that I wanted to "elevate" it to the "legal and legitimate" trailer trash marriage disasters (like Hunter's example here) I see every day.
With the Prop 8 trial starting Monday, same-gender marriage is all over the media and will be for weeks to come. Win or lose in California, I suggest that we as a community need to reconsider how much value we want to invest in the word "marriage" as a goal.
But keep poking idiots, H!
Reply to this
Good points Steve. I'd never get married myself, but like you am understanding that others may want to.
Reply to this
I agree with all the fine points made by my friend Steve. It DOES beggar the imagination why we Gs and Ls should want to imitate a really haphazard legal arrangement.
In the beggining when all this marraige talk/argument started with Vermont, I was advocating for the LEAGL equality without the MARRIAGE word!! MARRIAGE is a religious word and we will NEVER win while we use that word.
Our self-appointed national gay leaders stated using that word in the context of "separate is not equal". It's too late to turn back the clock, but if I could, I'd still advocate for civil unions or domestic partnerships.
Using "marriage" is treading on the religious turf of the fundies who would sacrifice their own children to deny us Gs & Ls our citizenship. Some of our brothers and sisters are learning it the hard way.
I wouldn't touch "marriage" with a ten-foot pole!!!!
Reply to this
It seems to me that gay marriage is more about human rights than it is simply marriage rights. We should all be able to do what we want with who we want. (If they want to do it too of course.) Basically we should try to have as few things as possible be "separate but equal" out of principle. This is America, not Amurica.
Other than that, I left that State you folks live in a long time ago and I have no great desire to go back. I must say that anyone who has the guts to stand there and slug it out with your average good-white Christian from Oklahoma is a better man than I.
Take care hunter, you're doing well.
Reply to this
I'm Mark's ex-wife and was very very uncomfortable with having been mentioned. Yes, he was abusive, but I did not "allow" it. I sent him to counseling, I went to counseling, and I also sent him to a medical doctor hoping it would stop his abuse. The medication helped more than anything, but he came home one day with the statement that he should not have to be medicated to be married. I suppose I agreed because I insisted he move out of our home after he hit our son so hard he left a terrible bruise ( and yes, I will stand before a court of law and swear to that). He is the worst of the worst, but I don't think I should be judged for his dishonor. I feel it unfortunate that I was mentioned; further, I feel sullied having been mentioned in the same conversation with these two individuals. I had a brother who was gay. He has died, but he was an amazing man. I want my name taken away from this site if at all possible, as I am even trying to get our marriage annulled from the church as I don't want my marriage to Mark (even though it lasted ten years ashamedly) to be acknowledged in the eyes of God, Man, or the State. Please remove my name from this diatribe as I don't feel I deserve to be associated with this group of idiotic jerks who are not only ignorant, and uneducated (Mark never even graduated high school), but are also vindictive jerks who will do anything to make the people around them miserable.
Reply to this
This article is funny to read; I happen to know Adrian and Mark and you are correct about them but then again she is too; ONLY one point. The bible has much to say about being gay for example Leviticus 20:13….If people claim to ‘know’ the bible, gay or not they should consider reading this part in particular. I have worked in or around San Francisco for many years now, and I have seen many different movements take place here in the city, and I have become fairly diverse as a straight man. Now consider this; even as I post this article you state “Email (will not be published)” but yet you have published her personal address and just about everything personal about her. In my opinion if you claim to be gay with a cause, and you want my respect, then you need to fight at the level I would highly respect; with intellectual thought. Going head to head with people who are extreme opposite with the same vigor is simply not the answer to your folks cause. You need to consider taking her personal information off your page. Fight her not how she would understand but how I would and that is how you folks are missing the point and why the gay and lesbian movement has takes such a long time to move forward.
Reply to this
The comments you made about a particular slut named Adrian Janzen are very true, I would know because I am that first husband, I would love to have a chance to set the record straight about myself and my involvement with her. I have never abused her, in fact I am in the fight of my life with her over my son, whom she IS using as a pawn in her sick games to get back at me & my new life.
I would be very interested if you would contact me personally via email. I am also on Facebook.
Thank You
Reply to this
I'm Keith's (Fred) current wife and I will say in all my life have I EVER witnessed such psychotic acts as Adrian has possessed. The worst part of her behaviors is when she decided to befriend my ex-husband's now ex-wife just to get at me...all because I married her ex. Between the two of them they stirred up some sick psycho crap about my son, which still isn't over....my son has been drug through so much stuff because of Adrian's sick and twisted mind it's ridiculous! She is a very disturbed, sick individual that needs more help than a psychologist can remotely offer. Thus far to date, because of her sick games and want to drag her son, my step-son and son, through court, our attorney bill is over $30k and climbing...not to mention what we've already paid of over $30k! I'd give just about anything to have her committed to a psych hospital, which by the way she once was by her own mother not too long ago at Ft. Supply, OK. Bottomline, she's a crazy individual!
Reply to this
A nice blog and really very interesting to read about it in detail thanks for sharing this.....article
Reply to this
hello good post n interesting
Reply to this
good post finding for the same thanks
Reply to this
Thanks man for the post...keep posting more..
Reply to this
Really interesting post..thanks for posting...
Reply to this